Skip to main content

Christopher, In re

Christopher, In re

Ruling
Intervenor was not entitled to sale proceeds as it did not file a proof of claim before the confirmation hearing in order to assert its interest in the sale proceeds. (Bankr. M.D. Fla.)
Issue(s)
Effect of Confirmation; Parties Bound by Confirmed Plan.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Christopher, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 12, 2023 , LexisNexis #0623-048