Skip to main content

Montreal, Me. & Atl. Ry., In re--Wheeling & Lake Erie Ry. Co. v. Keach

Montreal, Me. & Atl. Ry., In re--Wheeling & Lake Erie Ry. Co. v. Keach

Ruling
BC's finding that the creditor did not carry its burden of proof of value of claims was notclearly erroneous. (1st Cir.)
Issue(s)
Determination of Secured Status; Bifurcation of Claim; Valuation of Creditor’s Interest.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Montreal, Me. & Atl. Ry., In re--Wheeling & Lake Erie Ry. Co. v. Keach Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 09, 2020 , LexisNexis #0620-009