- 11 U.S.C.
State Empl. Dev. Dept v. Hansen (In re Hansen)
Apr
18
2012
Ruling
State unemployment insurance tax was not a "tax required to be collected" and was dischargeable.
Procedural posture
Appellant, California Employment Development Department, challenged the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California's judgment that certain unpaid unemployment insurance taxes were not the kind of taxes specified in 11 U.S.C.S. § 507(a)(8)(C). It thus held that the unpaid unemployment insurance taxes in this case did not give rise to a nondischargeable debt within the meaning of 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(1)(A). Appellees were debtors.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of State Empl. Dev. Dept v. Hansen (In re Hansen) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available