Skip to main content

In re Tine

In re Tine

Ruling
Bank's postpetition actions to preserve secured interest in property were willful violations of stay.
Procedural posture

Debtor brought a motion to adjudge a bank creditor in contempt and for violation of 11 U.S.C.S. § 362, for actions taken allegedly to preserve its secured interest in debtor's property.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Tine Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 04, 2012 , LexisNexis #0612-042