- FRBP
Penland v. Bryan (In re Bryan)
May
04
2011
Ruling
Creditor who received insufficient notice entitled to extension of time to file nondischargeability complaint.
Procedural posture
Creditor, acting pro se, filed a nondischargeability complaint against defendant debtor under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(2) and (6). Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it was untimely under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 4007(c) and 9006(b)(3). Plaintiff filed a motion to extend the time in which to file the complaint.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Penland v. Bryan (In re Bryan) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
: