- 11 U.S.C.
In re Parulan
Apr
22
2008
Ruling
Loss of overtime did not constitute a special circumstance that would warrant an adjustmet to debtor's disposable income.
Procedural posture
A trustee in a bankruptcy case objected to confirmation of the bankruptcy debtor's plan on the ground that the plan failed to apply all of the debtor's projected disposable income to payment of unsecured claims. The debtor asserted that special circumstances based on loss of overtime work warranted an adjustment to disposable income under 11 U.S.C.S. § 707(b)(2)(B).
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Parulan Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
: