- 11 U.S.C.
Caradon Doors & Windows Inc. v. Eagle-Picher Industries Inc.(In re Eagle-Picher Indus.)
May
05
2006
Ruling
Reorganization plan did not discharge manufacturer's claim since the plan permitted certain administrative expense claims to be filed after the plan confirmation and the plan's definition of recoverable administrative expense claims covered the claims rai
Procedural posture
Appellee manufacturer was named a defendant in a patent infringement case along with appellant debtor. The bankruptcy court agreed with the debtor that the patent infringement claim could not proceed because the confirmation of the 1996 reorganization plan discharged the manufacturer's claim, but the District Court for the Southern District of Ohio disagreed and reversed the bankruptcy court's decision.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Caradon Doors & Windows Inc. v. Eagle-Picher Industries Inc.(In re Eagle-Picher Indus.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member