Hedquist v. Fokkena (In re Hedquist)
Apr
21
2006
Ruling
Court rejected equal protection argument of pro se debtor in dismissing debtor's case for failing to comply with section 109(h) credit counseling requirement.
Procedural posture
Appellant, a pro se debtor, challenged a decision of the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota that held debtor and his wife were ineligible to file their chapter 11 bankruptcy case for failing to comply with the credit counseling requirements of 11 U.S.C. § 109(h), dismissed their case.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hedquist v. Fokkena (In re Hedquist) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member