Hardman, In re

Ruling: 
Creditor was not entitled to stay relief as there was insufficient evidence to determine that thetruck was not necessary to an effective reorganization even if debtor had no equity in thetruck. (Bankr. D. Utah)
Issue: 
Automatic Stay; Relief from Stay.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hardman, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on March 05,2021, LexisNexis #0421-058