Skip to main content

Tenderloin Health, FKA, In re--Schoenmann v. Bank of the West

Tenderloin Health, FKA, In re--Schoenmann v. Bank of the West

Ruling
Courts may account for hypothetical preference actions within a hypothetical chapter 7 liquidation if factually warranted, supported by appropriate evidence, and if the action would not contravene an independent statutory provision. (9th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Preferences; Avoidable Transfers; Receipt by Creditor.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Tenderloin Health, FKA, In re--Schoenmann v. Bank of the West Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on March 07, 2017 , LexisNexis #0417-050