Kelley v. Associated Bank (In re Petters Co.)
Feb
29
2016
Ruling
Ponzi scheme presumption could not serve as basis for holding that transfers to bank to cover overdrafts were fraudulent.
Issue(s)
Were transfers to debtor's bank to cover overdrafts avoidable as fraudulent?
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Kelley v. Associated Bank (In re Petters Co.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
: