Skip to main content

Bohm v. Titus (In re Titus)

Bohm v. Titus (In re Titus)

Ruling
Deposits from employer into account held by debtor by the entireties with spouse were fraudulent to the extent occurring in reach back period.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff chapter 7 trustee brought a fraudulent transfer action against defendant debtor and his non-debtor spouse pursuant to Pennsylvania state fraudulent transfer law, particularly 12 Pa. Cons. Stat. § 5105 (2011), via 11 U.S.C.S. § 544(b)(1).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Bohm v. Titus (In re Titus) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 29, 2012 , LexisNexis #0412-024