Skip to main content

In re Crome

In re Crome

Ruling
Creditor did not violate stay by terminating gas price after illegal tampering with meter.
Procedural posture

Pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. §§ 362(a)(6) and (k), the pro se debtors filed a motion for sanctions against their gas service provider for denial of residential gas service after their chapter 7 bankruptcy filing.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Crome Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 23, 2008 , LexisNexis #0409-110