Skip to main content

Drive Fin. Servs. LP v. Jordan

Drive Fin. Servs. LP v. Jordan

Ruling
Till case remains binding precedent under BAPCPA regarding application of prime-plus interest rate.
Procedural posture

Appellant creditor sought a direct appeal under 28 U.S.C.S. § 158(d)(2) of orders of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Texas amending and confirming a chapter 13 bankruptcy plan submitted by appellee debtors, which provided for interest on the creditor's secured claim on the debtors' truck at a "prime-plus" interest rate pursuant to the cram down provision of 11 U.S.C.S. § 1325(a)(5)(B).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Drive Fin. Servs. LP v. Jordan Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 12, 2008 , LexisNexis #0408-021