Skip to main content

Acosta, In re--Lavielle v. Acosta

Acosta, In re--Lavielle v. Acosta

Ruling
Collateral estoppel did not apply with regard to whether debtor's actions were both willfuland malicious as jury verdicts did not contain specific findings as to debtor's state of mind.(Bankr. D. Kan.)
Issue(s)
Exceptions to Discharge; Types of Debt Excepted; Willful and Malicious Injury to

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Acosta, In re--Lavielle v. Acosta Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 10, 2023 , LexisNexis #0323-038