Peta, In re

Court denied the stay relief motion because debtor's multiple bankruptcy cases were notintended to hinder or delay the bank. (Bankr. E.D. Pa.)
Automatic Stay; Relief from Stay; Scheme to Delay, Hinder and Defraud Creditors
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Peta, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on February 10,2021, LexisNexis #0321-077