Skip to main content

Peta, In re

Peta, In re

Ruling
Court denied the stay relief motion because debtor's multiple bankruptcy cases were notintended to hinder or delay the bank. (Bankr. E.D. Pa.)
Issue(s)
Automatic Stay; Relief from Stay; Scheme to Delay, Hinder and Defraud Creditors

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Peta, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 10, 2021 , LexisNexis #0321-077