Skip to main content

Harold, In re

Harold, In re

Ruling
Debtor's debt to IRS was nondischargeable as debtor intentionally violated duty to pay taxeswhile paying for large non-essential discretionary expenses. (Bankr. E.D. Mich.)
Issue(s)
Exceptions to Discharge; Types of Debt Excepted; Taxes; Fraud or Evasion.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Harold, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 12, 2020 , LexisNexis #0320-083