Skip to main content

Fugitt v. Mississippi Dept of Revenue (In re Fugitt)

Fugitt v. Mississippi Dept of Revenue (In re Fugitt)

Ruling
Motion for sanctions denied due to debtor's failure to allow creditor to amend answer.
Issue(s)
Could debtor's motion for sanctions against state department of revenue for "disingenuous" answer to complaint in proceeding to determine the validity and dischargeability of taxes be granted absent compliance with "safe harbor" service requirement?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Fugitt v. Mississippi Dept of Revenue (In re Fugitt) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 25, 2014 , LexisNexis #0314-105