Rosen v. Coggins & Harman P.A. (In re Rood)
Feb
28
2012
Ruling
Alleged fraudulent transfers prior to two-year reach-back period could not be avoided.
Procedural posture
Chapter 7 trustee sued defendant law firm to recover pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 548(a) funds paid to the firm by certain debtors for rent and legal fees for which the trustee argued that the debtors received no reasonably equivalent value, and to avoid a fraudulent conveyance occurring during the three-year period before filing under the Maryland Uniform Fraudulent Conveyances Act (Act), Md. Code Ann., Com. Law § 15-201 et seq. (2003).
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Rosen v. Coggins & Harman P.A. (In re Rood) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
: