Skip to main content

Kapila v. IRS (In re ATM Fin. Servs. LLC)

Kapila v. IRS (In re ATM Fin. Servs. LLC)

Ruling
Fraudulent transfer by debtor Ponzi scheme operator to IRS on behalf of second company it owned could not be avoided as IRS was not the initial transferee.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff Chapter 7 trustee filed a complaint against defendant, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), seeking to avoid an alleged fraudulent transfer from a debtor to the IRS pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 548. The trustee filed two motions for partial summary judgment. In response, the IRS filed a cross motion for summary judgment, raising the good faith defense provided to secondary or intermediate transferees under 11 U.S.C.S. § 550(b).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Kapila v. IRS (In re ATM Fin. Servs. LLC) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 01, 2011 , LexisNexis #0311-129