In re Strange
Jan
20
2010
Ruling
Debts secured by "910" vehicles could not be bifurcated.
Procedural posture
Debtor filed a petition under chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code and a plan for repaying her creditors. An auto credit company and a bank that held secured interests in vehicles the debtor owned filed objections to confirmation of the debtor's plan, claiming that the debtor's proposal to bifurcate debts she owed on two motor vehicles violated 11 U.S.C.S. § 1325(a) (hanging paragraph referencing paragraph 5) (the "hanging paragraph").
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Strange Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
: