In re Greenlee
Jan
07
2010
Ruling
Creditor who did not object to confirmation of plan could not claim discriminatory treatment.
Procedural posture
One of the chapter 11 debtors filed an objection to a claim of a creditor, alleging that the claim was not secured, as it was filed, but was due to be paid as an unsecured deficiency claim. The creditor conceded that the claim was not secured but contended that the plan provided discriminatory treatment of its claim in violation of 11 U.S.C.S. §§ 1122(a) and 1123(a)(4).
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Greenlee Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
: