McAdam v. New Hampshire (In re McAdam)
Jan
16
2009
Ruling
State collection of nondischargeable past due unemployment taxes did not violate discharge injunction.
Procedural posture
Plaintiff debtor alleged that defendant, State of New Hampshire Department of Employment Security (agency), violated the discharge injunction pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 524(a) and sought damages of $ 50,000. The agency filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), made applicable to bankruptcy pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 7012(b)(6).
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of McAdam v. New Hampshire (In re McAdam) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
: