In re Quigley
Feb
26
2008
Ruling
Personal injury claimants' inability to satisfy state's proof requirements did not affect right to vote on chapter 11 plan.
Procedural posture
A bankruptcy debtor submitted a proposed ballot to solicit votes on the debtor's reorganization plan from individuals who held asbestos personal injury claims. An ad hoc committee of asbestos victims objected to the ballot on the ground that it did not seek to identify individuals whose causes of action were unenforceable under state tort reform laws.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Quigley Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
: