Skip to main content

Snowden v. Freds Stores of Tenn. Inc.

Snowden v. Freds Stores of Tenn. Inc.

Ruling
Former employee was not judicially estopped from bringing an FLSA action for simply delaying by four months amending the debtor's chapter 13 bankruptcy schedule to include the potential claim.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff employee filed a notice of consent to become part of a class action to recover unpaid overtime wages brought against defendant employer pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 ("FLSA"), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201, et seq. The employer filed motions for summary judgment as to the employee's claim on the basis of judicial estoppel.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Snowden v. Freds Stores of Tenn. Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

opinion summary, case decided on March 10, 2006 , LexisNexis #0306-121