Hampton, In re

Ruling: 
Debt was nondischargeable as debtor clearly intended to strike plaintiff and debtor continuedto swing punches indicated that the debtor intended to injure the plaintiff. (Bankr. W.D. Ark.)
Issue: 
Exceptions to Discharge; Types of Debt Excepted; Willful and Malicious Injury to
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hampton, In re. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Consumer case opionion summary, case decided on December 18,2019, LexisNexis #0220-010