Skip to main content

Mitchell v. Anderson (In re Mitchell)

Mitchell v. Anderson (In re Mitchell)

Ruling
Creditor violated the discharge injunction but debtor was only entitled to limited actual damages.
Issue(s)
Was pro se debtor entitled to damages from pro se creditor, for prosecuting multiple lawsuits against her in violation of the automatic stay?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Mitchell v. Anderson (In re Mitchell) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 28, 2016 , LexisNexis #0216-114