Skip to main content

In re Hoilien

In re Hoilien

Ruling
Creditor did not violate stay in debtor's third case where debtor had not moved for an extension and the stay had expired.
Issue(s)
Was the automatic stay still in effect in debtor's third bankruptcy case filed within one year or had the stay expired, allowing creditor to proceed with sale of property?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Hoilien Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 03, 2015 , LexisNexis #0215-110