Skip to main content

Hawaii v. Parsons (In re Parsons)

Hawaii v. Parsons (In re Parsons)

Ruling
State agency's claim for consumer protection violation under §523(a)(7) was not subject to any time limit on filing and was nondischargeable.
Issue(s)
Is there a deadline for filing an adversary proceeding for nondischargeability under § 523(a)(7) and was state's claim based on violations of consumer protection nondischargeable under that section.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Hawaii v. Parsons (In re Parsons) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 21, 2014 , LexisNexis #0214-057