Skip to main content

In re Cupolo

In re Cupolo

Ruling
Confirmation denied due to impermissible modification of bank's secured claim.
Procedural posture

A bank objected to confirmation of a debtor's amended chapter 13 plan on the grounds that it impermissibly modified the bank's rights in violation of 11 U.S.C.S. § 1322(b)(2) and (3) and failed to meet the requirements of 11 U.S.C.S. § 1325(a). The bank also filed a motion for relief from stay and the co-debtor stay and for abandonment of property from the estate.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Cupolo Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 05, 2013 , LexisNexis #0213-135