Skip to main content

In re Lively

In re Lively

Ruling
Confirmation denied due to continued operation of absolute priority rule.
Procedural posture

After a bankruptcy court preliminarily announced that it would deny confirmation of a chapter 11 individual plan for violating 11 U.S.C.S. § 1129(b)(2)(B)(ii), it allowed briefings on the question of whether the Bankruptcy Abuse and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (BAPCPA) abrogated the absolute priority rule for individual chapter 11 cases.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Lively Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 30, 2011 , LexisNexis #0212-030