Skip to main content

In re Mace

In re Mace

Ruling
Plan proposing 20-year loan repayment period did not discriminate against creditor.
Procedural posture

A creditor objected to confirmation of the second amended plan proposed by a Chapter 11 trustee on the ground that the plan unfairly discriminated against the creditor and that the plan was not fair and equitable as required by 11 U.S.C.S. § 1129(b)(2)(A).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Mace Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 25, 2011 , LexisNexis #0211-129