In re Daniel-Sanders
Dec
30
2009
Ruling
Expense for luxury automobile conditioned on replacement or assurance that payments would not diminish distributions to unsecured creditors.
Procedural posture
A chapter 13 trustee objected to the confirmation of a plan under 11 U.S.C.S. § 1325(b), raising the issues of whether the debtor might use chapter 13 to retain multiple vehicles and whether her plan must compensate for the luxury character of a car loan.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Daniel-Sanders Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
: