- 11 U.S.C.
In re Hicks
Oct
22
2007
Ruling
Three-year plan term appropriate for debtor whose average monthly income was below median for six months prior to filing.
Procedural posture
An unsecured creditor objected to a debtor's chapter 13 plan, arguing that the debtor was required to pay a five year plan rather than a three year plan as determined by the means test because the debtor's income according to Schedule I was above the state median.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Hicks Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
: