- 11 U.S.C.
Crichlow, In re
Oct
31
2024
Ruling
Debtor was not entitled to nunc pro tunc or retroactive relief from an automatic stay as it had not exercised diligence in the form of a simple review of PACER electronic filing records in the days leading up to its partition sale. (Bankr. E.D.N.Y.)
Issue(s)
Automatic Stay; Scope; Acts to Obtain Property.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Crichlow, In re Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
: