Skip to main content

Lake, In re--Miller v. Henning

Lake, In re--Miller v. Henning

Ruling
Motion to reopen avoidance proceeding denied as defendant could not establish mistake,inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect but rather made a conscious decision not toanswer the complaint. (Bankr. E.D. Mich.)
Issue(s)
Fraudulent Transfers and Obligations; Elements of Fraudulent Transfers; Avoidable

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Lake, In re--Miller v. Henning Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 02, 2023 , LexisNexis #0124-012