- 28 U.S.C.
Automated Recovery Sys. of N.M., In re--Hawkes v. Automated Recovery Sys. of N.M.
Nov
22
2022
Ruling
Mandatory abstention was neither required nor permitted for the creditors' claims against thedebtor as the creditors were active parties in the case. (Bankr. D.N.M.)
Issue(s)
Bankruptcy Cases and Proceedings; Abstention; Mandatory Abstention.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Automated Recovery Sys. of N.M., In re--Hawkes v. Automated Recovery Sys. of N.M. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available