Skip to main content

In re Mast

In re Mast

Ruling
Where creditors were paid early modification was not appropriate but the chapter 13 plan was to be read as providing for a 60-month length and 100 percent return.
Issue(s)
Where chapter 13 plan's proposed distribution was paid early could the plan be modified to increase the percentage return to 100 percent and the plan term to 60 months?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Mast Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on November 17, 2015 , LexisNexis #0116-030