Skip to main content

In re Bailly

In re Bailly

Ruling
Reaffirmation was not required for assumption of car lease.
Issue(s)
Whether a debtor could assume a car lease under 11 U.S.C.S. § 365(p)(2) without also reaffirming a debt under 11 U.S.C.S. § 524(c).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Bailly Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 11, 2014 , LexisNexis #0115-005