Skip to main content

Grant Konvalinka & Harrison PC v Still (In re McKenzie)

Grant Konvalinka & Harrison PC v Still (In re McKenzie)

Ruling
Creditor required to establish validity of security interest in collateral when seeking relief from stay and trustee could use avoidance powers to defeat relief from stay after two year limitations period.
Issue(s)
Which party bears the burden of establishing the validity of a creditor's security interest in the debtor's property and may a trustee use his hypothetical lien-creditor status and avoidance powers to oppose a motion for relief from the automatic stay after the expiration of the two-year statutory limitation on avoidance actions.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Grant Konvalinka & Harrison PC v Still (In re McKenzie) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 17, 2013 , LexisNexis #0114-007