- 28 U.S.C.
In re Honeycutt
Dec
21
2012
Ruling
Transfer of venue denied where debtor's principal place of business was within district.
Procedural posture
Debtor's ex-spouse, the largest unsecured creditor in the case, filed a motion contending that venue was improper in the Eastern District of North Carolina pursuant to 28 U.S.C.S. §§ 1408, 1406, and sought an order transferring the case to the Western District of North Carolina, or dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 1014(a)(2). If venue was proper, she maintained the case should be transferred pursuant to 28 U.S.C.S. § 1412. Debtor objected.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Honeycutt Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Court
: