Skip to main content

New Hampshire v. McGrahan (In re McGrahan)

New Hampshire v. McGrahan (In re McGrahan)

Ruling
Second modified plan could not prohibit confiscation of tax refunds for support payments if it did not specifically address the issue.
Procedural posture

Appellant, the State of New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), challenged an order from the U. S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Hampshire granting appellee debtor's amended motion to modify his confirmed chapter 13 plan under 11 U.S.C.S. § 1329 by reducing the amount of DHHS's claim for unpaid child support. and holding that DHHS could not engage in any further intercepts of his income tax refunds.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of New Hampshire v. McGrahan (In re McGrahan) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 07, 2011 , LexisNexis #0112-030