Skip to main content

Marshall v. Johnson

Marshall v. Johnson

Ruling
Circuit court did not err in holding that Chapter 13 trustee was required to return her fee as thedebtor's plan was not confirmed and the adequate protection payments were not paymentsunder the plan. (7th Cir.)
Issue(s)
Payments; Plan Payments; Distribution or Return of Payments by Trustee.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Marshall v. Johnson Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

:
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 03, 2024 , LexisNexis #0724-046