In re Fairfield Sentry Ltd.

Foreign representative's motion to avoid sale of debtor's SIPA claim denied where foreign court had held sale valid.
Procedural posture: 
A foreign representative filed an application seeking an order under 11 U.S.C.S. §§ 105(A), 363, 1507(A), 1520(A)(2), and 1521(A) which invalidated a trade confirmation he entered on behalf of three investment funds ("debtors") to sell a claim the debtors filed in an action under the Securities Investor Protection Act ("SIPA"). An LLC that bought the claims opposed the application.
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Fairfield Sentry Ltd.. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on January 10,2013, LexisNexis #0213-032