Wiest v. Get Er Done Wiest LLC (In re Ted Wiest & Sons)

Ruling: 
Trustee who did not object to omission of 16 unsecured creditors at confirmation of plan could not seek modification.
Procedural posture: 
Debtors filed separate petitions under Chapter 12 of the Bankruptcy Code, and the court issued orders which consolidated all three cases and confirmed a plan the debtors proposed for repaying their creditors. A trustee who was appointed to administer the consolidated cases filed a motion pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 1229(a) to modify the debtors' plan. The debtors opposed the trustee's motion.
Issue: 
ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Wiest v. Get Er Done Wiest LLC (In re Ted Wiest & Sons). Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member
Commercial case opionion summary, case decided on February 18,2011, LexisNexis #0311-134