Skip to main content

Heflin v. Santander Consumer USA Inc. (In re Heflin)

Heflin v. Santander Consumer USA Inc. (In re Heflin)

Ruling
Repossession of truck violated stay.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff debtor sought damages, pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 362(k), against defendant, the secured creditor holding the purchase money first lien on his truck, alleging a violation of the automatic stay.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Heflin v. Santander Consumer USA Inc. (In re Heflin) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 02, 2011 , LexisNexis #0511-109