Skip to main content

Rule 9006(b)

In re Otero County Hosp. Assn

Ruling
Extension of time to file proof of claim denied due to absence of excusable neglect.
Procedural posture

A creditor filed an amended motion for extension of time to file a proof of claim pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9006(b)(1), contending that her failure to file a proof of claim on or before the bar date was a result of excusable neglect. The chapter 11 debtor objected to the motion.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Otero County Hosp. Assn Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on January 04, 2013 , LexisNexis #0113-135

In re Colquitt

Ruling
Debtors permitted to amend schedules and statement of financial affairs to reflect exemption of insurance claim for damage to their homestead in Hurricane Ike.
Procedural posture

The court held an evidentiary hearing on the chapter 7 trustee's objection to exemption of undisclosed insurance claim. Debtors sought leave to amend their schedules to exempt the insurance proceeds, citing excusable neglect under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9006.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Colquitt Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 08, 2012 , LexisNexis #0812-139

In re Bison Bldg. Holdings Inc.

Ruling
Late filing of proof of claim denied where creditor's failure to receive notice of bar date was due to its own failure to provide debtor with correct address and not excusable neglect.
Procedural posture

Before the court was a creditor's motion to allow late filing of proof of claim (POC).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Bison Bldg. Holdings Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on August 03, 2012 , LexisNexis #0912-034

In re Renegade Holdings Inc.

Ruling
Knowing, strategic decision by creditor not to file proof of claim was not excusable neglect that would allow for a late filing.
Procedural posture

A corporation moved to be allowed to file a claim after the expiration of the deadline for filing claims.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Renegade Holdings Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on August 19, 2011 , LexisNexis #0911-135

In re Graham Bros. Constr. Inc.

Ruling
Late filed proof of claim disallowed where creditor intentionally had sought to avoid jurisdiction of bankruptcy court.
Procedural posture

A claimant of Chapter 11 debtor filed a motion to allow a late claim.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Graham Bros. Constr. Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on May 16, 2011 , LexisNexis #0811-135

Jones v. Brown (In re Brown)

Ruling
Creditor's failure to meet filing deadline for adversary proceeding because of calendar error was not due to excusable neglect.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Jones v. Brown (In re Brown) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 17, 2011 , LexisNexis #0311-067

In re Pilgrims Pride Corp.

Ruling
Late-filed administrative expense claim allowed due to creditors' lack of sophistication, good faith and no likely material adverse affect on administration.
Procedural posture

A married couple, asked the court to allow a late filing of an administrative claim in chapter 11 proceedings of debtor, the husband's employer. The motion was precipitated by a filing, by debtor, of a suggestion of bankruptcy and a motion to dismiss claims against it in an arbitration proceeding regarding injuries suffered by the husband in a mishap claimed by movants to have been related to the husband's status as an employee.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Pilgrims Pride Corp. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on February 08, 2011 , LexisNexis #0311-101

In re Victory Mem. Hosp.

Ruling
"Unknown" creditor had constructive notice of bar date and could not file late proof of claim.
Procedural posture

This matter came before the court on a motion of the Administratrix of an Estate (claimant) for leave under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9006(b) to file a late proof of claim for $4.9 million against debtor. Debtor and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors opposed the motion.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Victory Mem. Hosp. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on August 12, 2010 , LexisNexis #0910-031

In re Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc.

Ruling
Creditors who did not file timely proofs of claim due to ordinary negligence were not entitled to enlargement of bar date.
Procedural posture

Movants, seven individual creditors, each of whom missed the bar date for filing claims against the debtor, sought relief in the form of enlargement of the bar date order under Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9006(b)(1), due to excusable neglect.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on May 20, 2010 , LexisNexis #0710-101

In re Schuster

Ruling
Enlargement of time for debtor to file proof of claim on behalf of creditor denied absent excusable neglect.
Procedural posture

Debtor filed a petition under chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code, and after the deadline the court set for creditors to file proofs of claim had passed, the debtor filed a motion for enlargement of time in which to file a proof of claim on behalf of a creditor. A trustee who was appointed to administer the debtor's bankruptcy estate filed an objection to the debtor's motion.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Schuster Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 12, 2010 , LexisNexis #0710-068