Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge markell

Fidler v. Donahue (In re Fidler)

Ruling
Case held open pending conclusion of bad check prosecution for determination of whether banks were using pressure of criminal prosecution to collect discharged debt.
Procedural posture

Chapter 7 debtor filed an adversary proceeding against defendants, two lenders and the Nye County, Nevada, District Attorney, seeking an order enjoining the District Attorney from prosecuting the debtor for bad checks he allegedly passed before he declared bankruptcy, and an order enjoining the lenders from testifying in any prosecution that was brought because he allegedly passed bad checks.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Fidler v. Donahue (In re Fidler) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 05, 2010 , LexisNexis #0211-024

In re Shat

Ruling
The absolute priority rule does not apply to individual chapter 11 debtors post-BAPCPA.
Procedural posture

Debtors' chapter 11 plan was before the court for confirmation.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Shat Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 22, 2010 , LexisNexis #0510-063

In re Bissell

Ruling
Chapter 13 debtors who were in default under plan could not propose modification except through compliance with procedures set forth in Bankruptcy Code.
Procedural posture

The debtors filed for relief under chapter 13 and a plan was confirmed. The chapter 13 trustee filed a motion to dismiss, pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 1307 (c)(6), because the debtors were delinquent in the payments required by their chapter 13 plan. The debtors sought to add an additional five months of payments to their plan and objected to the motion to dismiss.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Bissell Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 20, 2009 , LexisNexis #0709-067

In re Sattiewhite

Ruling
Bankruptcy petition preparer ordered to disgorge fees and was enjoined from operating due to numerous violations.
Procedural posture

On its own motion, the bankruptcy court ordered a bankruptcy petition preparer (BPP) to appear and show cause why the fees charged for bankruptcy petition preparation services that exceeded the United States Trustee's guidelines were not unreasonable and why an injunction preventing her from acting as a bankruptcy petition preparer should not be entered. The BPP failed to appear at the hearing.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Sattiewhite Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 07, 2009 , LexisNexis #0709-002

In re Sanford

Ruling
Debtor's counsel sanctioned for failure to file conversion order and for filing second case while first case was still pending.
Procedural posture

The court ordered debtor's counsel to show cause why he should not be sanctioned for his conduct in representing a debtor on whose behalf counsel had filed two chapter 13 cases (Case 1 and Case 2) and in connection with which he was paid fees and other charges. At issue inter alia was whether counsel had violated Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9011 and D. Nev. R. 9021(a).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Sanford Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 17, 2009 , LexisNexis #0609-070

In re Betcorp. Ltd.

Ruling
Australian company's winding up recognized as foreign main proceeding.
Procedural posture

Petitioner liquidator sought recognition of an Australian company's voluntary winding up in Australia as a foreign main proceeding under chapter 15. A United States (U.S.) company opposed recognition.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Betcorp. Ltd. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on February 09, 2009 , LexisNexis #0509-054

In re Lindquist

Ruling
Judicial lien avoided to the extent it impaired debtors'homestead exemption.
Procedural posture

The debtors filed an amended motion to avoid a creditor's judicial lien on their residential property, pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 522(f)(1).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Lindquist Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on October 15, 2008 , LexisNexis #1108-097

In re Martinez

Ruling
Creditor's attorney sanctioned for refusing to cooperate with correction of erroneous stipulation.
Procedural posture

The debtors filed for relief under chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code. In their schedules, the debtors listed a principal residence and two rental properties. A chapter 13 trustee filed an opposition to confirmation of the debtors' plan and recommended their case for dismissal based on ineligibility under 11 U.S.C.S. § 109(e).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Martinez Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on August 01, 2008 , LexisNexis #1008-054

Americredit Fin. Servs. v. Penrod (In re Penrod)

Ruling
Negative equity in "910" vehicle loan was not included in purchase money security interest.
Procedural posture

Appellant creditor challenged the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of California's order finding that the creditor's security interest in appellee debtor's car was only partially purchase money for purposes of 11 U.S.C.S. § 1325(a) (hanging paragraph referencing paragraph 5). The creditor also challenged the court's order confirming the debtor's chapter 13 plan.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Americredit Fin. Servs. v. Penrod (In re Penrod) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 28, 2008 , LexisNexis #1208-128

In re Smith

Ruling
Creditor with personal injury tort claim denied relief from stay.
Procedural posture

Plaintiff creditor filed an adversary proceeding against defendant chapter 7 debtor, claiming that the debtor committed libel. Three months after he filed his adversary proceeding, the creditor filed a motion to stay the adversary proceeding, and he moved for relief from the automatic stay that was imposed under 11 U.S.C.S. § 362 so he could proceed with a libel action he filed against the debtor in state court. The debtor opposed the motions.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Smith Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 24, 2008 , LexisNexis #0908-112