Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge jury

Chagolla v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. (In re Chagolla)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court erred in refusing to hear debtors' motion to value property and strip off allegedly unsecured lien.
Issue(s)
Could debtors reopen their case six years after it was closed for the sole purpose of filing a lien avoidance motion?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Chagolla v. JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. (In re Chagolla) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 09, 2016 , LexisNexis #0316-016

Shalaby v. Mansdorf (In re Nakhuda)

Ruling
Order for debtor's attorney to disgorge fees but fine and suspension orders reversed.
Issue(s)
Did bankruptcy court err in ordering that debtor's attorney be required to disgorge fees he had been paid and be sanctioned for violations of Rule 9011?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Shalaby v. Mansdorf (In re Nakhuda) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 04, 2016 , LexisNexis #0316-074

Free v. Malaier (In re Free)

Ruling
Debtors did not exceed chapter 13 debt limits where personal liability to unsecured lien holders was discharged in prior bankruptcy.
Issue(s)
Should chapter 13 case be dismissed where two unsecured loans caused debtors to exceed the eligibility limit?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Free v. Malaier (In re Free) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on December 17, 2015 , LexisNexis #0116-037

MacKenzie v. Neidorf (In re Neidorf)

Ruling
Postpetition payment pursuant to national settlement relating to debtor's foreclosed property was not property of the estate.
Issue(s)
Was postpetition payment to debtor pursuant to a national settlement between banking regulators and certain financial institutions, including the bank that foreclosed on debtor's property, required to be turned over as property of the estate?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of MacKenzie v. Neidorf (In re Neidorf) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 10, 2015 , LexisNexis #0815-019

Partida v. United States DOJ (In re Partida)

Ruling
Provisions of the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act override the automatic stay.
Issue(s)
Did the bankruptcy court properly hold that the government did not violate the automatic stay because its garnishment from debtor's pension and retirement benefits under the provisions of the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act (MVRA) was excepted from the stay?

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Partida v. United States DOJ (In re Partida) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 28, 2015 , LexisNexis #0615-114

Wu v. Markosian (In re Markosian)

Ruling
Post-chapter 11 petition earnings reverted to debtor upon conversion to chapter 7 but not sanctions based upon inherent authority.
Issue(s)
Whether an individual debtor's chapter 11 postpetition earnings which are property of the estate under 11 U.S.C.S. § 1115 revert to him or her upon a subsequent conversion to chapter 7.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Wu v. Markosian (In re Markosian) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on March 12, 2014 , LexisNexis #0414-021

City of San Bernadino Cal.

Ruling
City was an eligible chapter 9 debtor and filed its petition in good faith.
Issue(s)
Was city an eligible chapter 9 debtor and did it file its case in good faith.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of City of San Bernadino Cal. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on October 16, 2013 , LexisNexis #1113-028

Kipperman v. United States (In re 800Ideas.com Inc.)

Ruling
Bankruptcy court did not err in finding that trustee was not entitled to administrative expense claim for penalties on delayed filings of debtor's S corporation tax returns.
Issue(s)
Was trustee, who exercised judgment that filing of S corporation tax returns should be delayed until it was apparent if debtor's case was a no-asset case, entitled to an administrative expense claim for IRS penalties.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Kipperman v. United States (In re 800Ideas.com Inc.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Commercial opinion summary, case decided on July 22, 2013 , LexisNexis #0913-112

Newman v. Schwartzer (In re Newman)

Ruling
Order for turnover of tax refund affirmed.
Procedural posture

Appellant debtor sought review of an order from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada, which granted appellee chapter 7 trustee's motion to compel turnover of the debtor's 2011 tax refund pursuant to 11 U.S.C.S. § 542(a).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Newman v. Schwartzer (In re Newman) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on February 04, 2013 , LexisNexis #0313-092

McCoy v. Kuiken (In re Kuiken)

Ruling
Junior lien improperly avoided where debtor had not maintained a continuous interest in alleged homestead property.
Procedural posture

Appellant creditor challenged an order from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of California, which granted the motion of appellee, a chapter 7 debtor, to avoid the creditor's judicial line under 11 U.S.C.S. § 522(f).

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of McCoy v. Kuiken (In re Kuiken) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on January 04, 2013 , LexisNexis #0213-051