Skip to main content

Page Banner(Taxonomy)

judge pappas

Ng v. Farmer (In re Ng)

Ruling
Case properly dismissed where debtor's income increased significantly.
Procedural posture

Appellant debtors challenged orders from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Hawaii that dismissed their chapter 7 case under 11 U.S.C.S. § 707(b)(3)(B) on the motion of appellee United States trustee, asserting that the bankruptcy court abused its discretion in dismissing their case based on a change in circumstance when debtor husband's monthly income increased significantly.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Ng v. Farmer (In re Ng) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on September 07, 2012 , LexisNexis #1012-057

In re Wages

Ruling
Plan could not modify claim secured solely by mortgage on debtor's primary residence.
Procedural posture

Debtors declared chapter 11 bankruptcy and proposed a plan for repaying their creditors, and a bank that held a mortgage on real property the debtors owned and used as their residence filed an objection to confirmation of the debtors' plan, claiming that the plan could not be confirmed under 11 U.S.C.S. §§ 1129(a)(1) and 1123(b)(5) because it modified the bank's contractual rights. The court held a hearing on the plan and the bank's objection.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Wages Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on July 24, 2012 , LexisNexis #0812-064

Schwartz-Tallard v. Americas Servicing Co. (In re Schwartz-Tallard)

Ruling
Debtor entitled to attorneys' fees incurred defending appeal of stay violation order.
Procedural posture

Appellant debtor sought review of an order of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada that denied her motion for attorney fees and costs from defending a prior appeal of a stay violation order that was raised by appellee creditor. Debtor asserted damages should be awarded under either 11 U.S.C.S. § 362(k)(1), 11 U.S.C.S. § 105(a), Fed. R. Bankr. P. 9011.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Schwartz-Tallard v. Americas Servicing Co. (In re Schwartz-Tallard) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 28, 2012 , LexisNexis #0812-041

Bank of Idaho v. Powell (In re Powell)

Ruling
Debt based on breach of contract with creditor was dischargeable.
Procedural posture

Creditor brought an adversary proceeding against defendant bankruptcy debtor seeking a determination that a loan debt to the creditor was nondischargeable under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(6) based on the debtor's willful and malicious injury in breaching the debtor's contract with the creditor.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Bank of Idaho v. Powell (In re Powell) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 22, 2012 , LexisNexis #0712-121

Old Cutters Inc. v. City of Hailey (In re Old Cutters Inc.)

Ruling
Adversary proceedings against creditor city concerning annexation agreement were core proceedings.
Procedural posture

Plaintiffs, chapter 11 debtor and its creditor, commenced adversary proceedings against defendant city with respect to the city's proof of claim and its claimed lien on the debtor's property. The city questioned the court's subject matter jurisdiction and whether the court lacked the constitutional authority to enter a final judgment in the adversary proceedings.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Old Cutters Inc. v. City of Hailey (In re Old Cutters Inc.) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on June 18, 2012 , LexisNexis #0712-066

In re Coonrod

Ruling
Law firm that represented debtor in discrimination action denied administrative expense claim for fees where trustee never obtained court permission for appointment.
Procedural posture

Debtors filed a petition under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code, and a law firm that represented the female debtor in a discrimination action she filed against the Idaho Department of Corrections ("IDOC") filed a motion seeking payment of $6,666 in attorney's fees and $1,130 in costs for work it performed for the debtor, as an administrative expense. The chapter 7 trustee filed an objection to the firm's motion.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Coonrod Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 12, 2012 , LexisNexis #0712-005

In re Alexander

Ruling
LLC's judgment lien avoided to extent impairing debtor's homestead exemption but not as to non-debtor spouse's interest.
Procedural posture

Debtor filed a petition under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code and sought an order from the court which allowed her to avoid a judicial lien an LLC filed against real property she owned as a tenant by the entirety with her non-debtor spouse.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Alexander Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Consumer opinion summary, case decided on June 12, 2012 , LexisNexis #0712-015

Meyer v. Lepe (In re Lepe)

Ruling
Confirmation of plan which stripped lien while paying only percentage of unsecured claims was proper based on totality of circumstances.
Procedural posture

Chapter 13 Trustee challenged the order of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California confirming appellee debtor's amended plan.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Meyer v. Lepe (In re Lepe) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on May 09, 2012 , LexisNexis #0612-103

In re Hollifield Ranches Inc.

Ruling
Debtor's management's oversight was not sufficient grounds for granting approval of special counsel's employment nunc pro tunc.
Procedural posture

The chapter 11 debtor filed an Application to Employ Special Counsel Nunc Pro Tunc. The U.S. Trustee (UST) objected to the Application. A hearing was held at which time the court indicated it would grant the Application to employ special counsel. However, the court took under advisement the issue of whether the employment should be granted nunc pro tunc.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of In re Hollifield Ranches Inc. Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Commercial opinion summary, case decided on April 26, 2012 , LexisNexis #0512-074

Dietz v. Ford (In re Dietz)

Ruling
Debt properly held nondischargeable given ample evidence of willful and malicious injury.
Procedural posture

Debtor appealed from an adverse judgment of the U. S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of California, that awarded damages to creditors and declared their judgment debt as excepted from discharge under 11 U.S.C.S. § 523(a)(2)(A), (a)(4), and (a)(6). Debtor argued that the bankruptcy court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to enter the judgment.

ABI Membership is required to access the full summary of Dietz v. Ford (In re Dietz) Please sign in if you are already an ABI member, or otherwise you may Become an ABI Member

Court :
Judge or Jurisdiction information not available
Consumer opinion summary, case decided on April 23, 2012 , LexisNexis #0612-016